|
Dyson's Review of Max Goes to the Moon ABOUT/BOOKS/VISITS/ACTIVITIES/REVIEWS/CONTACT
Title: Max Goes to the Moon Author: Jeffrey Bennett Illustrator: Alan Okamoto Ages: 4-8 Number of Pages: 32 Format: hardback Publisher: Big Kids Science Date: 2003 Retail Price:$16.95 ISBN: 0972181903 Reviewer: Marianne Dyson Date of Review: June 26,
2003 This
picture book combines science fiction and science fact, and is reviewed as
both. The
Science Fiction The
fiction story is about a dog named Max who is being honored with a parade for
having rescued the space station crew (apparently in a previous book, but not
one I could find listed anywhere). Max howls at a siren, but reporters think he’s
howling at the moon because he wants to go there. The public insists that he
go, and so he and his owner, a girl named Tori, and 6 astronauts train for a
moon trip. They fly to the space station where they pick up their ship to go to
the moon. They land, romp around a little, and leave the moon after 12 days.
Billions of children watch the trip and urge the adults to build a big domed moon
colony. The adults are persuaded and put a telescope and a University there
where, “Students and scientists made important new discoveries every day.” Adults
will realize that it isn’t even remotely possible that the first trip back to
the moon will include a child and a dog. They will also know that by the time a
new moon lander (and a doggie spacesuit) is approved, designed, built, tested
and flown, the child would be grown up and the dog long dead. Establishing a
lunar colony will take much much longer. However, science fiction based in our
universe needs only to be possible, not practical. I fully agree with the
author’s choice not to worry about these things (a zillion-dollar budget could
work miracles!) so the story can move at a pace more suitable to a child’s perception
of time. The
story stands alone without the sidebars except for when Max goes after a Frisbee.
It says that he positions himself under it for the catch, and “There was only
one problem…” I turned the page expecting to find out what the problem was, but
the next paragraph has nothing to do with the Frisbee. To find out what the
problem was, the child must read the sidebar explaining that because of the
lack of air, the path would not be curved. This might mean that the problem was
that Max went to the wrong place. But the problem may have been that he couldn’t
catch it with a helmet on as shown in the picture. Maybe there could be Velcro on
the Frisbee and on the helmet near Max’s mouth? My
real complaint is that a dog and child go to the moon and nothing happens. There
is no problem for the dog and child to solve, no danger to overcome, no
difficult lesson to learn. Without a challenge of some sort, there was also no
sense of triumph for the historic accomplishment of returning to the moon. I
doubt a child would read the story multiple times. On
the other hand, the illustrations may well lure a child to reopen the book again
and again. They are vivid and full of energy. They also include realistic
details such as not showing stars in the black sky above the moon’s sunlit
surface. My favorite picture is of the crew struggling to get an excited Max into
his spacesuit. Every child who has put a sweater or costume on a pet will
relate to this difficulty. I also adored the UFO-looking design of the lander. (Can
we build one of those, Mommy, please?!) The
only minor technical mismatch between the text and illustrations is in two
consecutive images of Earth showing it growing from crescent to not quite first
quarter. The text says that they spend about 10 days on the moon. The Earth
would grow from crescent to gibbous in 10 days. However, the important thing is
that phasing is shown at all, and the two pictures could represent times closer
together than 10 days. A nice detail I noticed is that the Earth appears in
these pictures with the day lit side on top as it would appear from sites near
the equator. If the Earth were a vertical crescent, it would mean the site were
at a high latitude. The return opportunities from high latitudes to the space
station’s orbit occur only every 37 to 42 days (unless a new kind of propulsion
is developed), whereas from the moon’s equator, the opportunities are about
every 10 days, consistent with the story. Also, the Earth appearing midway
between the horizon and zenith is consistent with them landing near the western
limb of the near side. A western landing is required for them to be in daylight
for 10 days and have the Earth in the phase shown. As
a science fiction story for young kids, I give Max Goes to the Moon 1
point for the science being consistent and possible; 1 point for clear descriptions;
1 point for readability, and 1 point for a good concept (dog going to moon),
and 1 point for the cute character. It loses one point for plot. Total: 5
points. Max Goes to the Moon is a wonderfully illustrated science
fiction book for young children. Recommended. The
Science Book Every
page of this book has a sidebar box explaining the science behind the story. The
information covers the usual moon topics such as phases, as well as
descriptions of such things as how rockets and telescopes work. It was a real
pleasure to read these sidebars and not find any errors. As a scientist and
technical reviewer, I agree with the cover blurb stating that, “You can always
trust Big Kid Science products to be scientifically accurate…” The author really
knows his science. That
said, I felt that the sidebars were too wordy and detailed for the 4-8 age
group. The type size is extremely small and intimidating and sentences are long
and complex. An adult would be required to read these to the child. It is
difficult to say that any of this rich material should be cut, but it really
belongs in a book for the 8-12 crowd. As
a science book, I award 2 points for accuracy, 1 for clarity (the explanations
are long but very thorough), 1 for the use of current information, 1 for the
accurate and useful illustrations, and minus one for readability. Total: 5
points. Max Goes to the Moon is as scientifically accurate as a book can
be, though the science is most appropriate for older children. Recommended. Return to Science in Kids' Books |